Page 65 - IJSA, Vol. 7, No 1, 2024
P. 65

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2024
                      рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

            l’existence  d’une  souffrance  psychique  extrême,   (existence  of  a  serious  pathology  and  incurable,
            insupportable et unapaisable”.                     producing constant and unbearable suffering) but little or
            The  subsequent  complaints  expressed  to  the  Judicial   nothing was done to offer her that support which could
            Authority  by  the  patient’s  son  T. M.,  a  university   control or contain her suffering. In addition, it seems that
            professor, accusing of non-compliance with Belgian law   her  daughter’s  affection  could  probably  be  recovered,
            and  of  not  having  been  informed  of  what  had  been   and that there was a network of friends and trust on which
            authorized by the two Belgian doctors, were not followed   the woman could still count.
            up;  in  May  2017  he  was  informed  of  the  filing  of  his   Without  questioning  the  seriousness  of  the  suffering
            criminal complaint due to insufficient evidence. Hence,   caused by the psycho-pathological condition from which
            his decision to appeal to the European Court of Justice   Mrs. Godelieva de Troyer was affected, her protracted
            for  the  violation  of  articles  2  and  8  of  the  European   state of suffering (albeit between the ups and downs that
            Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).                 are  normally  recorded  in  these  clinical  situations),  the
            Going  into  the  merits  of  the  matter,  the  Strasbourg   incomplete  control  of  the  depressive  symptomatology
            judges,  without  declaring  the  existence  of  a  conflict   despite  the  prolonged  pharmacological  and  psycho-
            between art. 2 of the ECHR and the Belgian law (which,   behavioral  therapies,  the  distrust  gained  towards
            under  certain  conditions,  decriminalized  euthanasia),   psychiatric  treatments,  her  social  isolation  and  loss  of
            recognized that the strictness of the procedure envisaged   hope, what appears indisputable is that the robustness of
            by  Belgian  internal  legislation  had  not  been  respected   her  decision  was  not  subjected  to  any  particular
            because  the  same  Prof. W. D.,  having  personally   verification and that some of the doctors she interviewed
            supervised  the  euthanasia  procedure  from  the  initial   politely declined the invitation or temporarily suspended
            request  of  the  woman,  could  not  have  expressed  any   it,  believing  that  the  decision  to  die  at  the  hands  of  a
            judgment on the merits of his work, and would therefore   doctor required a more complete maturation.
            have  had  to  abstain  for  reasons  of  independence  and   Trying to give a practical answer to these questions, we
            competence.                                        hypothesized  to  transfer  the  human  story  of
            Thus  sanctioning  Belgium,  but  without  however   Mrs. Godelieva de Troyer to the Italian context (where
            addressing the compliance of Belgian law with art. 2 of   euthanasia  is  forbidden)  asking  ourselves  what  could
            the  ECHR  (Bucalo,  2023)  and  without  discussing  the   have happened if she had asked Italian doctors to help her
            robustness of the woman’s decision as had been done,   to die with assisted suicide, a practice permitted within
            however, by the same judges in the Haas sentence against   limits and the guarantees provided by the Constitutional
            Switzerland  (Butturini,  2011)  whose  protagonist  had   Judge in sentence no. 242/2019; sentence with which the
            been a patient suffering from bipolar disorder who had   art. 580 of the penal code (“Instigating and assisting in
            resorted to the Court complaining about the inertia of the   suicide”)  makes  the  actor  no  longer  punishable  in  the
            country to supply a drug lethal for his assisted suicide,   hypothesis  in  which  the  execution  of  the  intention  of
            which should have put an end to his unbearable suffering.   suicide,  autonomously  and  freely  formed,  of  the  adult
                                                               person has been  facilitated provided that the person is
            Results and Discussion                             affected by an irreversible pathology, kept in life from
            The Choice to Die with the Help or by the Hand of the   life-sustaining  treatments,  the  condition  is  a  source  of
            Doctor  (Medically  Assisted  Death):  Limitations  and   physical  or  psychological  suffering  that  the  person
            Safety Profiles in Italy                           considers as intolerable, while remaining fully capable of
            Beyond  the  complexity  of  the  case,  as  it  has  been   making free and informed decisions.
            reconstructed  by  the  Judges  of  the  European  Court  of   These  conditions  and  the  methods  of  execution  of
            Justice,  the  human  story  of  Mrs.  Godelieva  de  Troyer   assisted  suicide  must  then  be  verified  by  a  public
            raises  many  questions.  Two  in  particular,  for  what   structure  of  the  national  health  service,  subject  to  the
            concerns us here, having to ask what it was:       opinion of the territorially competent ethics committee,
            (1) the robustness of her decision to die by euthanasia as  thus identifying a whole series of constraints – not only
            scientific  evidence  demonstrates  that  cognitive  deficits  procedural but above all substantial – which have set, and
            can represent an important component of MDD (Douglas  they  continue  to  pose,  problematic  questions,  not  yet
            &  Porter,  2009)  proving  capable  of  compromising  fully resolved.
            memory, attentional functions and learning (Kriesche et  For example, it is much debated which Ethics Committee
            al.,  2023)  with  a  worsening  of  the  deficits  caused  by  is properly required to express its opinion in these cases.
            repeated  relapses  (Semkovska  et  al.,  2019)  and  aging  In response to the specific question posed by the Minister
            (Dotson et al., 2020);                             of Health, on 24 February 2023 the National Bioethics
            (2) the support (medical, psychological, pharmacological  Committee considered that the responsibility should be
            and  human)  that  should  have  been  guaranteed  to  the  attributed to the CETs (Territorial Ethics Committees),
            woman and with what possible precautions (or guarantee  referred  to  in  the  Decree  of  26  January  2023
            rules)  could  and  should  have  brought  to  maturity  the  (“Identification of forty territorial ethics committees”),
            decision of the same to put an early end to life her.  uniformly present in the country.
            The general impression that emerges from the analysis of  Another important topic of debate concerns life support,
            this  sad story is that the doctors consulted by Mrs. de  on which there are frankly antithetical ideas, there being
            Troyer were particularly attentive to the formal aspects  those who indicate it in those measures that require the
            required by Belgian law to finalize the euthanasia request  use of artificial means and the support given by machines

                                                           63
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70