Page 14 - IJSA, Vol. 3, No 2, 2020

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020

Table 3. Data on expected values based on the observed distributions in the levels of institutional preparedness for
emergency remote teaching in conditions of the CoVID-19 pandemic.

Observed and expected values grouped according to respondents’ answering scale
Very positive/ Positive/ Negative/ Very negative/ Undecided/ Total
Parameter very high high low very low neutral
Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec-
ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted
Teachers 72 67 64 61 45 51 13 17 22 20 216
Students 111 116 103 106 96 90 35 31 33 35 378
Total 183 183 167 167 141 141 48 48 55 55 594
H0-hypo-
thesis, % 31 28 24 8 9 100

Table 4. Data on expected values based on the observed distributions in the levels of individual preparedness for
emergency remote teaching in conditions of the CoVID-19 pandemic.

Observed and expected values grouped according to respondents’ answering scale
Very positive/ Positive/ Negative/ Very negative/ Undecided/ Total
Parameter very high high low very low neutral
Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec-
ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted
Teachers 56 64 119 128 16 9 12 7 13 8 216
Students 121 113 232 223 8 15 7 12 10 15 378
Total 177 177 351 351 24 24 19 19 23 23 594
H0-hypo- 30 59 4 3 4 100
thesis, %

Table 5. Data on expected values based on the observed distributions in the levels of satisfaction/dissatisfaction with
individual educational outcomes in conditions of the CoVID-19 pandemic.

Observed and expected values grouped according to respondents’ answering scale
Very positive/ Positive/ Negative/ Very negative/ Undecided/ Total
Parameter very high high low very low neutral
Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec-
ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted
Teachers 48 63 100 115 40 22 16 9 12 8 216
Students 125 110 215 200 21 39 8 15 9 13 378
Total 173 173 315 315 61 61 24 24 21 21 594
H0-hypo- 29 53 10 4 4 100
thesis, %

Table 6. Data on expected values based on the observed distributions in the measure of the impact of social distancing
procedures caused by the CoVID-19 pandemic on the respondents’ self-assessment of physical and mental health.

Observed and expected values grouped according to respondents’ answering scale
Very positive/ Positive/ Negative/ Very negative/ Undecided/ Total
Parameter very high high low very low neutral
Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec- Obser- Expec-
ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted ved ted
Teachers 16 12 64 47 74 89 14 28 48 40 216
Students 17 21 65 82 170 155 64 50 62 70 378
Total 33 33 129 129 244 244 78 78 110 110 594
H0-hypo- 5.6 21.7 41.1 13.1 18.5 100
thesis, %

The critical value χ cr for df=4: χ cr=9.448 by p=0.05; emergency remote teaching in conditions of the CoVID-
2
2
2
2
χ cr=13.277 by p=0.01. The calculated value χ is bigger 19 pandemic.
than the critical value (>13.277) in responses to the Both categories of stakeholders reported high levels of
second question (22.083), to the third question (44.389), individual preparedness for emergency remote
and to the fourth question (29.666). It confirms that the teaching/learning, the students displaying a slightly
differences in the compared aggregates of data are higher level of self-confidence in dealing with the
2
statistically significant (df=4, χ =22.083, р<0.01; df=4, situation. In contrast, the marked differences in
2
2
χ =44.389, р<0.01; df=4, χ =29.666, р<0.01). responses observed during the survey suggest the idea
Thus, the statistical analysis has proved that responses that the students are affected more by the social
from teachers and students demonstrate no difference of distancing measures, which testifies to the negative
opinion when answering the questions dealing with the effect of social distancing on the physical and mental
level of institutional/individual preparedness for health of this category of stakeholders.

12