Page 57 - IJSA, Vol. 6, No 2, 2023
P. 57

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2023
                      рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

            potential  and  the  speed  of  development  of  AI-based   consciousness,  is  not  capable  of  harming  humanity.
            information technologies are so great that we may have   However,  the  real  dangers,  which  are  becoming
            to concede this primacy in the near future.        increasingly apparent, should not be ignored.
            It has been less than a year (30 November 2022) since the   In a metaphorical sense, AI can be compared to the fuel
            launch  of  ChatGPT.  ChatGPT  is  an  AI-based    or electricity needed to run a machine. The advent of a
            conversational  Large  Language  Model  (LLM).  The   new  fuel  (petrol)  made  it  possible  for  the  internal
            potential applications of LLMs in research and practice   combustion engine to function. Automobiles appeared,
            look promising, given their ability to generate creative   aeroplanes... Even today, many people still measure the
            responses.                                         power of a car’s engine in horsepower. Nowadays, hardly
            In  the  first  3  months  of  its  existence,  ChatGPT  has   anyone  has  to  do  their  travel  planning  with  horses  in
            become  an  indispensable  tool  for  100  million  people   mind. But this does not mean that horses have become
            worldwide. A large number of people of different ages   useless  and  can  be  disparaged  as  unnecessary  or
            and  social  statuses,  from  schoolchildren  to  university   inefficient.
            professors, have found ChatGPT to be an indispensable   It is still directly human beings who decide how to use
            tool  for  dealing  with  issues  in  their  personal  and   and interact with new scientific advances. A human can
            professional lives.                                refuel  the  drone  and  send  it  on  a  research  mission  to
            This  popularity  makes  ChatGPT  an  obvious  positive   another planet, or send it to destroy the inhabitants of a
            answer to the question of  whether  AI has become our   neighbouring  country.  A  clear  example  is  the  russian
            assistant.  We  are  sure  that  there  will  be  millions  of   federation’s  military  action  in  Ukraine.  In  this  case,
            schoolchildren and students who actively use ChatGPT   drones with integrated warheads are actively deployed in
            for their studies and for solving tasks assigned to them in   large numbers, capable of making a long flight over the
            educational institutions. At the same time, it is very likely   battlefield, independently detecting a target, classifying
            that  millions  of  teachers  and  university  professors  are   its  level  of  importance  among  others,  and  making  a
            also using AI to prepare assignments for these students.   decision to destroy it.
            This  creates  a  paradoxical  situation  in  which  the  AI   Despite the negative trends and realities we live in today,
            becomes both the object and the subject of action (writing   there is still hope that humanity is able to understand the
            and solving its own tasks).                        responsibility of using AI and can channel it to advance
            The other question is whether this is a problem or not. As   our civilisation, science and culture.
            in  the  first  case,  we  believe  that  the  answer  to  this   Therefore, the issue of creating a harmonious relationship
            question  will  be  in  the  affirmative.  Undoubtedly,   between  humans  and  AI  is  very  important.  These
            replacing one’s own opinion and efforts in solving tasks   relationships can be both personal and professional. In
            with  an  AI  answer  will  have  a  negative  impact  on   this case, personal relationships, such as the role and the
            students’  personal  cognitive  sphere  (intelligence)  and   level, are determined by each person for him or herself;
            competence level.                                  professional  relationships  can  be  regulated  from  the
            To be fair, we should point out that this is a problem for   outside and have serious consequences for the human.
            the faculty as well. Over the past year, there has been a   We share the views of researchers who claim that the use
            significant  increase  in  the  number  of  research  studies,   of  AI  will  be  the  reason  for  the  reduction  of  large
            and  therefore  articles,  using  AI-based  tools.  Previous   numbers of workers in various fields in the coming years.
            studies  have  addressed  the  legitimacy  of  using  AI  in   It can cause various social conflicts.
            scientific research and publications (Melnyk & Pypenko,   It is therefore crucial to regulate these relationships in a
            2023),  and  the  dilemma  of  quality  versus  quantity  of   legal and regulatory context.
            scientific  publications,  which  will  become  particularly   We think this is difficult to achieve, but it is certainly
            relevant  with  the  advent  of  AI  (Melnyk  &  Pypenko,   possible.  The  challenge  is  that  AI  is  becoming
            2021). Discussions about the tendency to replace humans   increasingly  pervasive  in  people’s  daily  lives  and
            with  AI, and the potential threats associated  with  this,   workspace.  Therefore,  something  more  sophisticated
            have  been  ongoing  since  the  term  was  introduced  by   than  Asimov’s  Three  Laws  of  Robotics  must  be
            McCarthy (1959) in the middle of the last century. These   developed to manage this complex system of human-AI
            issues  certainly  deserve  attention.  In  most  cases,  they   relationships (Asimov, 1942).
            remained theoretical views of the problem. However, the   We believe that in the near future, countries with high
            situation has changed dramatically over the past year.   levels  of  economic  growth  will  develop,  ratify  and
            That is why we are focusing on the above axiom about   implement laws that regulate the norms of interaction and
            the irreversible penetration of AI into our life activities   relationships between humans and AI.
            and  the  subsequent  increase  in  its  influence  on  all   Today, thanks to the activities of COPE (2023) and major
            spheres. As a consequence of this trend, the need to build   scientific  publishers  (WAME,  JAMA),  standards  and
            a real system of harmonious interaction and relationship   rules  have  been  developed  for  the  use  of  AI-based
            between humans and AI becomes obvious.             Chatbots in scientific publications.
            This problem is likely to be a key issue for this century,   The first steps towards legitimising  AI-based Chatbots
            as the survival of humanity literally depends on it.   were  taken  by  Melnyk  and  Pypenko  (2022).  These
            We are not inclined to dramatise the situation about the   scientists  have  created  and  implemented  the  AIC  AI
            increasing danger to humanity from the development of   Chatbots  information  technology  platform  (AIC  AI
            AI.  We  believe  that  AI,  in  the  absence  of  individual   Chatbots, 2023), which provides technological solutions

                                                           55
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62