Page 42 - IJSA, Vol. 1, No 1-2, 2018

International Journal of Science Annals

Table 3. Indicators of PSI of combatants before and after the activities of the psychological rehabilitation program (in
standard units).

Scales of the method “Diagnostics of Study groups (n=70) Significance of
psychological safety of an individual” discrepancies
Before implementation After implementation t p
Morally communicative 94.00 ± 14.39 99.62 ± 16.11 0.94 –
Motivational and volitional 106.85 ± 10.95 114.85 ± 14.53 1.71 0.10
Value and semantic 104.54 ± 13.05 113.77 ± 15.81 1.74 0.10
Internal comfort 103.15 ± 14.69 114.23 ± 13.71 2.14 0.05
PSI index 408.00 ± 41.70 440.46 ± 57.57 1.77 0.10

120 Before conducting a program of
100
Indicator value 80 combatants
psychological rehabilitation of
60
After conducting a program of
40
psychological rehabilitation of
20
combatants
0
moral and communicative motivational and volitional value and semantic internal comfort

Figure 1. Dynamics of indicators of psychological safety of an individual of combatants because of the program of
psychological rehabilitation.

Table 4. Profile “Evaluating the effectiveness of the psychological rehabilitation program”.

No. Question Scale of evaluation
1 How important for you were the program topics? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 Did you know something new to yourself? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 Will you be able to apply the acquired knowledge in practice? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 Measure how much the program is provided with new information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5 How consistent and logical was the material presented? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6 Evaluate the volume of the material outlined. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 How comfortably did you feel yourself during the presentation of the material? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 How difficult was it for you to perceive the material? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9 Evaluate the pace of material presentation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 How much are you satisfied with trainers? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Note. Instruction: “Dear participants of the psychological rehabilitation program! We ask you to answer the
questionnaire. Your opinion about the events is very important for us. Your evaluations will help us to make our joint
work more effective. All your thoughts will be taken into account when drawing up the program for its further use”.

17%
Satisfied
83%
Needs correction

Figure 2. Satisfaction (subjective assessment) by carrying out measures for the psychological rehabilitation of
combatants.

The results of the anonymous survey showed that 83% Discussion
of participants in psychological rehabilitation were The problem of psychologic rehabilitation of the
satisfied with the program, 17% of respondents military service members participating in combat
expressed their wish for further correction (Figure 2). actions always was relevant in any country of the
40