Page 41 - IJSA, Vol. 4, No 2, 2021
P. 41

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021
                      рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

            Figure 1
            Conceptual Model of Cyberchondria


                                                        Hedonic
                                                       motivations
                                                                              H3
                                    H1


                                                         H2
                      Cyberchondria                                                   Online shopping
                                                                                        enjoyment



                                    H4                                          H5
                                                     Fear of COVID-

                                                           19
                                                                .

            Materials and Methods                               Table 1
            In 2020, in Tunisia, the COVID-19 pandemic appeared   Characteristics of the Final Sample
            as  a  central  health  concern  with  extended  media                        Participants
            coverage about it. Increased health anxiety is evolving   Characteristics   number (n)   percentage (%)
            among  Tunisian  consumers.  The  study’s  primary   Gender
            objective was to test the conceptual model (see Figure 1)   Male          147           41.4
            that captures relationships between cyberchondria, fear   Female          208           58.6
            of  COVID-19 and hedonic shopping  motivations. We   Total                355          100.0
            created a survey online, starting with a brief overview   Age
            introducing the purpose of the study and reminding the   From 18 to 25    83            23.4
            confidentiality of all responses. For this study, we used   From 26 to 35   85          23.9
            convenience sampling to target anxious consumers due   From 36 to 45      99            27.9
            to the difficulty of using probability sampling. To recruit   From 46 to 60   50        14.1
            respondents,  we  joined  some  non-governmental       Over 61 years      38            10.7
            Facebook groups created to fight against COVID-19 in
            which  the  community  members  showed  their  anxiety   Total            355          100.0
            toward the health situation.
            We collected data at the beginning of the year 2021. To   McElroy  et  al.  (2019)  developed  a  multidimensional
            be eligible for participation, individuals had to be living   measure  of  cyberchondria  called  the  Cyberchondria
            in Tunisia and 18 years of age or older.            Severity Scale (CSS). This scale consists of 33 items
            The scales we used were first translated from English to   corresponding  to  five  dimensions:  (1)  excessiveness
            French and Arabic, then back-translated into English by   (repeated  nature  of  online  searches),  (2)  compulsion
            a third party. The back-translated English version was   (web  searches  interrupting  other  aspects  of  on/offline
            then compared with the original version for modification   activities),  (3)  distress  (negative  emotional  response),
            and to improve the accuracy of the translation. To test   (4) reassurance (seek out professional medical advice),
            the comprehensibility of the measures, a pretest with 20   and  (5)  mistrust  (conflict  arising  when  medical
            consumers  was  conducted.  We  finalized  the      professional and online self-diagnosis do not align). The
            questionnaire based on the results of the pretest. Table 1   scale  has  been  translated  and  validated  in  several
            shows  the  specific  details  of  the  final  sample.   languages and many studies have validated its structure.
            Participants included 355 individuals. The sample was   In addition, using confirmatory bifactor modeling, Norr
            predominantly female (58.6%) and the average age in   et al. (2015) have demonstrated that the scale measures
            this sample was between 36 and 45.                  a  general  factor,  as  well  as  lower-order  dimensions.
            All measurement scales were adopted from established   Some  replications  built  on  previous  suggestions  to
            literature, with question items being adjusted to fit the   reduce the length of the scale and to eliminate the last
            context  of  the  study.  Individuals  were  asked  to  read   dimension (Barke et al., 2016; McElroy et al., 2019). For
            some statements and indicate the degree to which each   the current study, we adopted the short version proposed
            statement  typically  applies  to  them  on  a  five-point   by Barke et al. (2016) consists of 15 items (3 items for
            Likert-type  scale  ranging  from  “strongly  disagree”  to   each  dimension).  However,  we  followed  some  of  the
            “strongly agree”.                                   previous  suggestions  by  eliminating  the  last  trust

                                                           39
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46