Page 42 - IJSA, Vol. 4, No 2, 2021
P. 42

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021
                      рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

            dimension (McElroy et al., 2019; Norr et al, 2015). The   respectively, for each construct (Table 2). Finally tests
            final list contains 12 items only.                  of  discriminant  validity  were  also  acceptable  as  the
            The  present  study  uses  the  new  scale  of  the  Fear  of   squared correlation between every two constructs in the
            COVID-19 (FC-19S) developed recently by Ahorsu et   model was less than the AVE of these two constructs
            al.  (2020).  This  scale  has  a  stable  unidimensional   (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
            structure  with  good  psychometric  properties.  Initial   Table 2
            results indicated that the FCV-19S had good properties   Reliability and Convergent Validity Test
            from different types of testing (i.e., Rasch analysis). The                          Convergent
            internal  consistency  was  good  as  well  (α=0.82;   Variable         Composite      validity
            composite reliability=0.88).                                            reliability    (AVE)
            We  measured  six  hedonic  shopping  motivations:   Excessiveness        0.87         0.761
            gratification  seeking  (GRA),  idea  shopping  (IDE),
            adventure seeking (ADV), social shopping (SOC), role   Compulsiveness     0.93         0.866
            play  (ROL),  and  value  shopping  (VAL),  based  on   Distress          0.89         0.804
            Arnold and Reynolds (2003; 2012). This measurement   Reassurance          0.91         0.821
            was  validated  in  several  contexts  (Ali  et  al.,  2020;   Adventure   0.84        0.717
            Horváth & Adıgüzel, 2018). It contains 18 items; three
            to each dimension.                                   Gratitude            0.84         0.751
            The online shopping enjoyment was measured by a scale   Role              0.90         0.766
            developed by Babin et al. (1994). This unidimensional   Value             0.92         0.813
            scale was used in several contexts and had demonstrated   Social          0.93         0.878
            its validity and its good reliability (α=0.872).
            We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFAs) and   Idea               0.88         0.831
            a  structural  equation  model  (SEM)  was  examined.  In   Fear          0.94         0.689
            this  model,  cyberchondria  factors  were  considered  as   Shopping
            predictors  of  six  hedonic  motivations,  the  fear  of   enjoyment     0.95         0.816
            COVID-19  and  the  online  shopping  enjoyment.  The
            CFAs  and  SEM  were  conducted  in  AMOS  23  with   We also tested whether CMB was a potential problem
            Maximum of Likelihood (ML) as an estimation method.   following  a  procedure  suggested  by  Podsakoff  et  al.
            We verified first the conditions of the applicability of   (2003).  A  latent  construct  capturing  the  common
            those  methods  by  verifying  the  outliers,  the   method variance was added to the measurement model
            multinormality and the multicollinearity. Bootstrapping   and  allowed  to  load  on  all  of  the  indicators.  Results
            was  envisaged  as  a  procedure  for  dealing  with  non-  indicate that CMB is not a potential threat to the validity
            normal  data  (Byrne,  2001),  generated  confidence   of the findings.
            intervals that were used instead of t-values to evaluate   We used AMOS 23 to test our research hypotheses. We
            the significance of path estimates because the data did   tested four alternative models to assess the superiority of
            not exhibit multivariate normality. Model fit was then   our  model  as  we  followed  prior  procedures  in  well-
                               2
            assessed  using  the  χ   statistic,  for  which  a  non-  established  works  (Bajaj  et  al.,  2016;  Diallo  &  Seck,
            significant value indicates good model fit. In addition,   2018):  the  hypothesized  structural  model,  a  direct
            other  fit  indices  were  interpreted  to  provide  an   model,  and  two  full  mediation  models.  The
            approximate estimate of the model fit. Specifically, we   hypothesized  structural  model  (Model  1)  fit  the  data
            checked  the  comparative  fit  index  (CFI),  the  Tucker-  well   overall   (χ =2929.480;   df=706;   p=0.000;
                                                                                2
            Lewis Index (TLI), and the root mean square error of   NFI=0.824;  IFI=0.860;  TLI=0.836;  and  CFI=0.859;
            approximation (RMSEA).                              RMSEA=0.094).
                                                                For  the  direct  effect  of  cyberchondria  on  online
            Results                                             shopping enjoyment (Model 2), results show that three
            First,  our  results  indicate  that  more  than  70%  of  the   of  the  four  cyberchondria  dimensions  were  positively
            sample reported experiencing high or moderate levels of   affecting online shopping enjoyment. The health-related
            cyberchondria. Mean item analysis showed that going   anxiety that cyberchondriac express influence positively
            online to search for symptoms often disrupts their time   their online shopping experiences. This could reinforce
            spent  not  only  on  leisure  activities  but  also  on  their   the  hypothesis  supposing  that  during  this  pandemic,
            work. Participants showed difficulty in controlling their   online  shopping  is  considered  as  one  of  the  main
            ruminations  regarding  symptoms  that  they  have   solutions  for  anxious  people.  Results  of  testing  the
            researched online.                                  second  hypothesis  (H2a-d)  are  presented  in  Model  2
            The  data  indicated  that  the  measurement  model   (Figure 2).
                                       2
            exhibited  an  acceptable  fit  (χ =2857.269;  df=699;   For mediating effect of hedonic shopping motivations
            p=0.000;   CFI=0.863;   NFI=0.828;   TLI=0.840;     (Model  3),  we  followed  current  trends  in  mediation
            RMSEA=0.093).  Tests  of  convergent  validity  were   analysis (Preacher et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2010) and
            acceptable as the composite reliability and the average   examined  the  direct  and  indirect  effects  of
            variance  extracted  (AVE)  both  exceeded  the     cyberchondria  through  conditional  process  analysis.
            recommended  minimum  cutoff  of  0.7  and  0.5,    More  precisely,  in  a  third  model,  we  tested  a  full

                                                           40
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47