Page 31 - IJSA, Vol. 2, No 1-2, 2019
P. 31

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 2, No. 1-2, 2019

            conventional  thinking  of  the  native  country,  does  not   being,  his  or  her  seen  environment  and  surrounding
            match the seen things and their position, their need or   things.
            function  in  the  new  country,  and  restoration  of  such   In  terms  of  things,  as  van  Manen  (2014,  p. 306–307)
            vision requires effort and even help of the others.   writes, “materiality may guide our reflection to ask how
            Things without Connection: Temporality              things are experienced. The things are our world in its
            New things however, do not immediately become one’s   material thing like reality.” Thus, things are a world that
            own. As it is described above, new things are strange,   reflects our vision and point of view we might say our
            can be intimidating because of their unpredictability or   inner state. To the contrary, a relation with the things
            may force to imagine a different life, which will be in a   may  depend  on  our  point  of  views  and  experiences.
            new country, and/or force to be aware of where he or she   Gabriele felt that the house she and her family stayed in
            is, as describe in the following anecdote:          was not inhabited, there were none of the girl’s things,
            Our new house is an old building with several floors.   no scent of a family, and no common home intimacy.
            The flooring on the second floor is unstable, squeaking.   She  felt  that  she  would  not  live  in  this  house  for  the
            We  go  to  the  toilet  or  shower  on  the  second  floor  in   whole time, even though that was the first plan. In his
            groups so it isn’t so scary because we have someone to   essay  on  the  “Hotel  Room”,  van  Lennep  (1987)
            hold hands.  All children slept in one room, the  small   describes  how  much  intimate  relations  are  in  one  or
            children  slept in one bed, the older on the floor. The   another person’s home. Things, walls, the whole house
            house  seemed  so  dark,  like  those  haunted  houses  in   is filled with the scent, feelings, emotions that reflect the
            movies. We can’t get used to it. It seemed to me like a   life of a person living there. Van Lennep (1987) writes:
            ghost (Gabriele).                                   We  always  enter  someone’s  living  room  for  the  first
            Gabriele  was  11  years  old  when  her  family  and  she   time with a certain hesitation or embarrassment, that is
            moved to another country. She describes her memories   into the room he “inhabits,” not because this room is an
            about  the  first  family  house  in  the  new  country;  the   expression of himself, but because this dwelling refers
            memories of that house are very vague, as if through a   to a much more intimate relation than any expression by
            mist. Her recollection is of an old, unstable structure: it   him could ever be (p. 210).
            seems that the house could have collapsed at any time.   Like to a guest, to another person who gets into a new
            The family lived there for more than 2 years, quite a long   place, this place, even if it is called one’s own (mine),
            time to get used to this place and get familiar with it. But   has so  “little” in itself (p. 212) of  what can be called
            for Gabriele, this new house never became a home, for   one’s own (my) room. No human being belongs here: it
            all that time the girl had imagined it as a temporal shelter   does not have his or her scent, nor chosen things. This
            – a place where she is just sleeping over for a few nights   relation with the house shows the girl’s relation with her
            before some permanent place is going to be found. But   migration. She sees herself as a temporal guest in the
            what  is  really  behind  that  temporality?  By  the  term   new world of the new country. She does not recognize
            temporality I mean state of being for the short or long   herself in this world, since there is no relation with this
            period of time and this period has a certain moment of   country. A new house, new things in this house are the
            ending,  while  something  that  lasts  forever  or  always   symbols of her being new in this country.
            does  not  have  an  ending,  speaking  without  any   Meanwhile, van Lennep (1987) writes that even a tourist
            philosophical reasoning.                            coming to a new city and living in a hotel room after a
            From  the  theoretical  point  of  view  migration  can  be   long day spent in the city comes back to the room to rest
            defined  as  three  types:  short-term,  long-term  and   and  calls  it  “my  room”.  As  the  author  writes,  the
            circular  immigration  (Europos  Migracijos  Tinklas,   pronoun  “my” in the expression “my room” does not
            2010).  The  short-term  immigration  is  defined  as  the   express  my  possession  of  it,  but  precisely  a  relation
            migration  with  a  particular  motive  or  purpose  (work,   between me and the room. On the very first moment a
            study, family reunion, etc.), after which people return to   person enters a new room, he or she begins “the process
            the country of origin or move further to another country   of inhabiting the room” (p. 212). And after some time in
            (Europos Migracijos Tinklas, 2010). Meanwhile, long-  the  course  of  inhabiting  “the  relation  of  intimacy  has
            term (permanent) migration is migration with the goal to   been created between this room and me” (p. 212). Van
            stay  permanently  in  the  target  country.  Circular   Lennep  (1987)  writes  about  experiences  of  grown-up
            migration  in  general  can  be  understood  as  a  cycle  of   people who, after a certain period of time in a new place,
            migration  which  is  comprised  of  a  migrant  person’s   assume control over things, they become dependent on
            departure from his or her country of origin, stay for some   him or her, and in this way become more and more “his”
            time in another country, return to his or her country of   or  “hers”.  And  maybe  with  time  such  “dependency”
            origin  and  repeated  departure  to  a  foreign  country   replaces  a  sense  of  temporality,  and  an  immigrant
            (Europos  Migracijos  Tinklas,  2010).  Long-term  and   becomes more and more integrated into the new life.
            circular  migrations  are  different  from  short-term   The Imagined Value of Things
            migration  in  the  length  of  the  period  of  departure.   New things may bring the opposite feelings, create the
            However,  from  the  phenomenological  point  of  view,   illusion of a better life, and a vision for the future that
            each migration, regardless of its purpose and the planned   soon  may  appear  to  be  incorrect.  Such  a  situation  is
            time  of  departure,  especially  at  the  beginning  of   described  in  an  anecdote  from  Grynberg’s  (2012)
            migration  stage,  might  be  seen  as  temporal,  in  other   dissertation:
            words, a person might feel that this period of migration   My father and uncle were waiting for us at Essendon
            might end one day and he or she will go back home.   airport.  My  uncle  drove  us  to  the  flat  my  father  had
            Such temporality lies within the feelings of the human   rented for us. It was on the ground floor located in a
                                                           30
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36