Page 51 - IJSA, Vol. 4, No 2, 2021
P. 51

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021
                      рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

            Table 1
            Resulting Table as Consequence of the Execution of the Competing Hypothesis Method

                           Evidences               Hypothesis 1                 Hypothesis 2
                     Evidence A            Support (+)                 Support (+)
                     Evidence B            Highly support (++)         Not support strongly (--)
                     Evidence C            Support (+)                 Not apply (no relation)
                     Evidence D            Not apply (no relation)     Not support (-)
                     Evidence E            Not support (-)             Support (+)
                     Subtotal              4 (++++); 1 (-)             2 (++); 3 (---)
                     Total                 +3 (+++)                    -1 (-)

            The winning hypothesis, in the Table 1 example will be   Review,            70,            35–36.
            the Hypotheses 1. But it is important to remember that   https://community.mis.temple.edu/mis0855002fa
            the  winning hypothesis  has  more support according to   ll2015/files/2015/10/S.M.A.R.T-Way-
            with the available evidence and not a higher probability   Management-Review.pdf
            of occurrence.                                     Espona, M. J.,  &  Fisher, C.  (2015,  November  5-7).
            In  the  case  this  method  is  performed,  and  a  winning   Teaching information quality to professionals in
            hypothesis  is  identified,  it  means  the  solution  to  the   intelligence   government   agencies   [Paper
            problem with more support in the available information   presentation].  Information  Systems  Education
            has been found.                                          Conference   (ISECON),    Orlando,   FL.
            Finally, it is time to plan the implementation using the   https://www.isecon.org/ISECON2015ProgramG
            Gantt chart. To do it, first the objectives and tasks must   uideFinal.pdf
            be  identified.  There  are  four  phases:  design,  planning,   Genero, M. B.,  Cruz-Lemus, J. A.,  &  Piattini, M. G. V.
            execution and evaluation. The objectives preferable must   (2015).  Métodos  de  investigación  en  ingeniería
            be SMART (Doran, 1981).                                  del  software  [Research  methods  in  software
            In  this  last  step,  must  be  taken  into  consideration  the   engineering].           Ra-Ma.
            system designed at the beginning and put it together with   http://190.57.147.202:90/xmlui/handle/12345678
            the winning hypothesis. This is part of the diagnosis, that   9/2525 [in Spanish]
            needs also a survey to include the qualitative evaluation   Heuer, R. J. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis.
            of the situation. Planning and Executing follows the usual   Center   for   the   Study   of   Intelligence.
            logic  but  during  the  evaluation  is  good  to  add  a  new   https://www.ialeia.org/docs/Psychology_of_Intel
            survey to include again the people involved and get their   ligence_Analysis.pdf
            opinion, always critical to the success.           Kitchencham, B.,    Pretorius, R.,   Budgen, D.,
            This  problem-solving  course  has  been  presented  in   Brereton, O. P.,   Turner, M.,   Niazi, M.,   &
            different formats many times, to different audiences, with   Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews
            different objectives, with outstanding results.          in  software  engineering  –  A  tertiary  study.
            Considering  the  audience  and  their  specific  needs,  the   Information  and  Software  Technology,  52(8),
            focus is on the different methodologies. Usually, the most   792–805.
            demanding stage is the implementation of the systemic    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
            method but at the same time it is the  most rewarding,   Von  Bertalanffy, L.  (1968).  General  systems  theory:
            since  many  participants  experience  Eureka  moments   Foundations,  development  and  applications.
            when discovering their real problems.                    George                          Braziller.
            The methodologies included in the courseled to finding   http://monoskop.org/images/7/77/Von_Bertalanf
            the  solution  to  many  problems,  in  an  unbiased,    fy_Ludwig_General_System_Theory_1968.pdf
            structured, auditable and at the same time,  in a simple   Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy:
            way.                                                     What  data  quality  means  to  data  consumers.
                                                                     Journal  of  Management  Information  Systems,
            References                                               12(4),                             5–33.
            Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write   http://www.jstor.org/stable/40398176
                  management’s goals and objectives. Management


            Cite this article as:
            Espona, M. J. (2021). Interdisciplinary integrated tools to problem solving: How to apply to writing a thesis and planning
            a research. International Journal of Science Annals, 4(2), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.26697/ijsa.2021.2.5

            The  electronic  version  of  this  article  is  complete.  It  can  be  found  online  in  the  IJSA  Archive
            https://ijsa.culturehealth.org/en/arhiv
                              This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
                              License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
                              the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en).

                                                           49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56