Page 10 - IJSA, Vol. 1, No 1-2, 2018

International Journal of Science Annals

The carried out research proves that only certain important technologies from the proposed list (16
competences are required by the student youth. It can pedagogic technologies) (Melnyk, 2016, р. 36). These
be explained by today’s realities and peculiarities of an technologies are to be ranged according to the level of
educational institution. The student youth’s demand their value.
into forming competences necessary to be mastered by The demand rating for using pedagogic technologies by
a graduate should be taken into account by teachers studying was as follows:
when they include them into the content of curricula, as 1) technologies of distance learning 24.7%;
there is a correlation connection between the results of 2) technologies of project learning 23.1%;
studying and competences (Melnyk, 2017). Studying 3) technologies of problematic learning 21.3%;
the demand into forming the student youth 4) technologies of programming learning 9.8%;
competences will favour operational efficiency and 5) technologies of game learning 8.2%;
flexibility by reacting to their demands. 6) all other technologies 12.9%.
Questioning cadets and students into their demand for The summary rating of the results of the respondents’
using pedagogic technologies in studies has been questionnaires as for the demand into using the
carried out by similar methods which presupposed pedagogic technologies by studying is shown in
individual, group and collective choice of 5 most percentage in Figure 3.

distance learning technologies
project learning technologies
25
Indicator value, % 20 24,7 23,1 21,3 9,8 8,2 12,9 programm learning technologies
problem learning technologies
15
game learning technologies
10
5
Types of technologies other learning technologies
0

Figure 3. Summary rating of student youth questionnaires results for demand into using pedagogic technologies in
higher educational institution.

The questionnaires results of cadets and students of studying have turned out to be as follows:
NANGU for the last 5 years prove that among the most 1) visual methods (illustrations, demonstrations, video
required technologies are those which give them a watching) 23.2%;
possibility to be more mobile and provide for acquiring 2) verbal methods (explanations, clarifications,
professional competences which guarantee discussion, dispute) 19.1%;
competitiveness at the labour market. 3) practical method (research, exercises under control)
Questioning cadets and students for their demand into 16.7%;
using pedagogic methods in high school by the 4) method case-study (active problematic and
methods mentioned above, presuppose individual, situational analysis) 15.9%;
group and collective choice of 5 most important 5) reproductive method (work by the ready models)
pedagogic methods from the proposed list (25 10.8%;
pedagogic methods) (Melnyk, 2016, р. 27-29). These 6) all other methods 14.3%.
methods are to be ranged according to the level of their The summary rating of the respondents’ questionnaires
value. results for the demand into using pedagogic methods
The demand rating for using pedagogic methods by by studying is illustrated in percentage in Figure 4.

visual method
10.8% 14.3%
15.9% verbal method
23.2%
practical method
16.7%
19.1% method case-study
reproductive method
other methods

Figure 4. Summary rating of students’ questionnaires results for demand into using pedagogic methods in high school.

8