Page 11 - IJSA, Vol. 6, No 1, 2023

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2023
рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

Although we don’t have the slightest doubt that it will be turnitins-ai-writing-and-chatgpt-detection-
read by AI, because this paper will be converted into capability
multiple formats and found in several dozen COPE. (2023, January 30). Artificial intelligence in the
scientometric databases, repositories, and search engines. news.
It is time for humans to define the legitimacy we give https://publicationethics.org/news/artificial-
to AI. intelligence-news
We have offered the essence of the definition “Human- COPE. (2023, February 13). Authorship and AI tools.
AI System”. This allows us to clarify the essential COPE position statement.
features of the new phenomenon under consideration, https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-
which opens prospects for its further study. statements/ai-author
Authors should be transparent about the use of AI tools. COPE. (2023, February 23). Artificial intelligence and
This will allow readers to know what and how the paper authorship.
was created, and it will allow reviewers, editors, and https://publicationethics.org/news/artificial-
publishers to check the quality of the paper. intelligence-and-authorship
We encourage you to consult the recommendations of COPE. (2023, March 23). Artificial intelligence (AI) and
leading publishers Springer Nature and Taylor & Francis, fake papers.
as well as the expertise of COPE Council members on the https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-
ethics of scientific publication, and the recommendations discussions/artificial-intelligence-fake-paper
of APA experts on citing and reproducing ChatBot- COPE Council. (2021, September). COPE Discussion
generated text. document: Artificial intelligence (AI) in decision
The need to determine the legitimacy of using AI-based making – English.
ChatBots in scientific research prompted us to develop a https://doi.org/10.24318/9kvAgrnJ
method for indicating AI involvement and the role of COPE. (n. d.). International Journal of Science Annals
ChatBots in a scientific publication. [COPE Members page]. COPE. Retrieved March
We recommend using the developed base logo to indicate 17, 2023, from
ChatBots’ involvement and contributions to the writing https://publicationethics.org/members/internation
of the paper. This would be appropriate for authors, al-journal-science-annals
reviewers, editors, readers, and, from our point of view, Dans, E. (2019, February 6). Meet Bertie, Heliograf and
ethical. Cyborg, the new journalists on the block. Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/enriquedans/2019/
Funding Source 02/06/meet-bertie-heliograf-and-cyborg-the-new-
This research did not receive any outside funding or journalists-on-the-block/?sh=416c2163138d
support. Davis, P. (2023, January 13) Did ChatGPT just lie to me?
The Scholarly Kitchen.
References https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/01/13/di
Anderson, K. (2023, January 13). ChatGPT says it’s not d-chatgpt-just-lie-to-me/
an author. The Geyser. https://www.the- Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical
geyser.com/chatgpt-says-its-not-an-author/ evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of
Çalli, B. A., & Çalli, L. (2022). Understanding the using artificial intelligence and emerging
utilization of artificial intelligence and robotics in technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning
the service sector. In S. B. Kahyaoğlu (Eds.), The Environments, 10, 12.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3
Economics and Finance: Vol. 2. Accounting, Farahani, M. S. (2023). Applications of artificial
Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: intelligence in social science issues: a case study
Theory and Application (pp. 243-263). Springer. on predicting population change. Journal of the
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8997-0_14 Knowledge Economy.
Carpenter, T. A. (2023, January 11). Thoughts on AI’s https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01270-4
impact on scholarly communications? An Hern, A. (2022, December 31). AI-assisted plagiarism?
interview with ChatGPT. The Scholarly Kitchen. ChatGPT bot says it has an answer for that. The
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/01/11/ch Guardian.
atgpt-thoughts-on-ais-impact-on-scholarly- https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2022/de
communications/ c/31/ai-assisted-plagiarism-chatgpt-bot-says-it-
ChatGPT. (n. d.). Scopus Author ID: 58024851600 has-an-answer-for-that
[Scopus Author Identifier]. Scopus. Retrieved Hoffman, R. with GPT-4. (2023). Impromptu:
April 01, 2023, from Amplifying our humanity through AI. Dallepedia
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?author LLC. https://www.impromptubook.com/wp-
Id=58024851600&ref=the-geyser.com content/uploads/2023/03/impromptu-rh.pdf
Chechitelli, A. (2023, January 13). Sneak preview of McAdoo, T. (2023, April 7). How to cite ChatGPT. APA.
Turnitin’s AI writing and ChatGPT detection https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt
capability. Turnitin. McCarthy, J. (1959). Programs with common sense. In
https://www.turnitin.com/blog/sneak-preview-of- Proceedings of the Teddington Conference on the

9