Page 18 - IJSA, Vol. 2, No 1-2, 2019

рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; DOI:10.26697/ijsa IJSA

Funding source educational institutions. Science and Education,
This research received no specific grant from any 5, 128–134. doi 10.24195/2414-4665-2017-5-22
funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-profit Melnyk, Y., & Pypenko, I. (2017). Innovative potential
sectors. It has been conducted on the basis of Flight of modern specialist: The essence and content. In
Academy of National Aviation University. Yu. B. Melnyk (Ed.), Psychological and
pedagogical problems of modern specialist
References formation (pp. 9–16.). Warsaw: ANAGRAM;
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language Kharkiv: KRPOCH.
proficiency: The interface between learning and doi:10.26697/9789669726094.2017.9
assessment. New York, NY: Continium. Melnyk, Yu. B., & Pypenko, I. S. (2018). Training of
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom future specialists in higher education institutions.
assessment techniques (2nd ed.). San Francisco: International Journal of Science Annals, 1(1-2),
Jossey-Bass. 4–11. doi:10.26697/ijsa.2018.1-2.01
Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s Morrison-Shetlar, A. I., & Marwitz, M. R. (2001).
guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, Teaching creatively: Ideas in action. Eden
and active learning in the classroom. San Prairie: Outernet.
Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nickolaeva, N. I., & Sopova, A. S. (2015).
Becta. (2003). What the research says about interactive Formirovanie professionalno-kommunikativnoj
whiteboards. Coventry, UK: British Educational kompetentnosti budushhih voennyh letchikov v
Communications and Technology Agency processe obuchenija aviacionnomu anglijskomu
(Becta). jazyku [Forming of future pilots’ professional-
Blake, M. E., & DeVries, B. A. (2004). Developing communicative competence in the process of
speaking skills. Integrating the language art (3rd teaching Aviation English]. Molodoi uchenyi –
ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway Young scientist, 13(93), 675–678. [in Russian]
Publishers. Norris, J. M. (2006). The why (and how) of assessing
Brainstorm. (2019). Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved student learning outcomes in college foreign
August 10, 2019, from language programs. Modern Language Journal,
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/engl 90(4), 590–597. doi:10.1111/j.1540-
ish/brainstorm 4781.2006.00466_2.x
Gonzalez, J. (2015, October 15). The big list of class Pometun, O., & Pirozhenko, L. (2002). Interaktyvni
discussion strategies. Cult of Pedagogy. tekhnolohii navchannia: Teoriia, dosvid
Retrieved from [Interactive teaching technologies: Theory,
https://www.cultofpedagogy.com experience]: Kyiv: A.P.N. [in Ukrainian]
Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2010). English language teaching Pometun, O., & Pirozhenko, L. (2004). Suchasnij urok.
materials. Cambridge University Press. Іnteraktivnі tehnologії navchannja [Modern
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver. Lesson. Interactive technologies of learning].
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Кyiv: Vidavnictvo A. S. K. [in Ukrainian]
Jolliffe, L. B. (1991). Industry’s team approach to Reinders, H., & White, C. (2010). The theory and
classroom projects. Journalism Educator, 46(2), practice of technology in materials development
15–24. and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English
Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher Language Teaching Materials: Theory and
education students’ attitudes to student-centered Practice (pp. 58–80.). Cambridge: Cambridge
learning: Beyond educational bulimia. Studies in University Press.
Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334. Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to
doi:10.1080/03075070310000113432 teach any subject. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Knapen, R. (2018, June 13). Re: 20 interactive teaching Trace, J., Hudson, T., & Brown, J. D. (2015). An
activities for in the interactive classroom [Web overview of language for specific purposes. In
log message]. Retrieved from J. Trace, T. Hudson, & J. D. Brown (Ed.),
https://www.bookwidgets.com/blog/2018/06/20 Developing Courses in Languages for Specific
-interactive-teaching-activities-for-in-the- Purposes (pp. 1–23). Honolulu: University of
interactive-classroom Hawaii.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). VanGundy, A. (2005). 101 Activities for teaching
New York: Cambridge University Press. creativity and problem solving. San Francisco:
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811678 Pfeiffer.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of Veen, W., Lam, I., & Taconis, R. (1998). A virtual
multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), workshop as a tool for collaboration: towards a
Cognitive theory of multimedia learning (pp. 31– model of telematic learning environments.
48). University of California: Santa Barbara. Computer & Education, 30(1-2), 31–39
McGlynn, A. (2001). Successful beginnings for college Watkins, R. (2005). 75 e-Learning Activities: Making
teaching. Madison: Atwood. Online Learning Interactive. San Francisco:
Melnyk, Yu. (2017) Study of trends of students’ demand Pfeiffer.
for the formation of competences by higher

17