Page 26 - IJSA, Vol. 6, No 2, 2023

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2023
рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

Table 4
Pearson Correlations for PGWBI Scales
Scales ANX DEP PWB SC GH VT
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 1.000 0.703 0.825 0.787 0.649 0.811
ANX Sig. (2-tailed) - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 0.703 1.000 0.550 0.615 0.691 0.623
DEP Sig. (2-tailed) <0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 0.825 0.550 1.000 0.761 0.548 0.788
PWB Sig. (2-tailed) <0.001 <0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 0.787 0.615 0.761 1.000 0.613 0.731
SC Sig. (2-tailed) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - <0.001 <0.001
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 0.649 0.691 0.548 0.613 1.000 0.630
GH Sig. (2-tailed) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - <0.001
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
**
**
**
**
**
Pearson Correlation 0.811 0.623 0.788 0.731 0.630 1.000
VT Sig. (2-tailed) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 -
N 323 323 323 323 323 323
Note. ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); ANX – Anxiety, DEP – Depressive Mood, PWB – Positive
Well-Being, SC – Self-Control, GH – General Health, VT – Vitality.
Figure 2
Level of Use of Coping Strategies for the Primary Subscale by Ukrainian University Students during the War (Points)

Note. PS – Problem Solving, CR – Cognitive Restructuring, EE – Express Emotions, SS – Social Support, PA – Problem
Avoidance, WT – Wishful Thinking, SC – Self-Criticism, SW – Social Withdrawal.

The highest coping strategy scores for all groups were (9.2 points) in addition to the SS coping strategy
for the CR coping strategy (10.0 points for Group 3, (8.6 points). This is manifested in the independent
9.6 points for Group 1, 9.4 points fir Group 2). This search for mistakes, the evaluation of one’s own
demonstrates the importance of changing maladaptive behavior and the results of one’s own thinking.
thoughts to more appropriate ones in order to reduce the In addition to social support (9.2 points for the SS
level of suffering. However, there are some differences coping strategy), Group 2 is characterized by wishful
in the scores of the groups studied, which may indicate thinking (9.3 points for the WT coping strategy), which
certain peculiarities of the impact of proximity to the indicates that students’ beliefs and decisions are formed
combat zone on students. according to what is pleasurable rather than according to
Group 1 is characterized by the SC coping strategy rationality or reality.

24