Page 15 - IJSA, Vol. 4, No 2, 2021

International Journal of Science Annals, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021
рrint ISSN: 2617-2682; online ISSN: 2707-3637; DOI:10.26697/ijsa

and then inputting assessment data. When the trial was b) Small group trial. This small group assessment is a
carried out there were discrepancies in the application, transitional assessment between individual assessment
namely when assessing toddlers aged 3 months 24 days, and field/large group testing. The purpose of the
the display of the developmental assessment form assessment in this group is to ensure that the product can
leading to the form for the assessment of 6 months of really be used properly and to see the temporary impact
age, this error has been revised and the application can of using the product. Researchers do not interact with
be continued for small group trials. users and only as observers. Researchers will respond if
there are serious problems.

Table 1
Results of Expert Validation of Child Nursing Materials

Value scale
Statement
1 2 3 4 5
Material Aspect
The suitability of the material with the concept of +
growth and development
Concept truth +
Order of presentation of material +
The images used are in accordance with the material +
Educational Aspect
Material suitable for educational purposes +
Content clarity +
Indicator clarity +
The suitability of the image given to clarify the +
material
Use of each material +
Communication Aspect
Accuracy of terms +
Grammatical accuracy +
Ability to increase user motivation +
Total score 57
Average 4.8 (Good Category)

Table 2
Validation of Nutritionist Materials

Value scale
Statement
1 2 3 4 5
Material Aspect
The suitability of the material with the concept of
growth and development as well as stimulation +
Concept truth +
Order of presentation of material +
The images used are in accordance with the
material +
Educational Aspect
Material suitable for educational purposes +
Content clarity +
Indicator clarity +
The suitability of the image given to clarify the +
material
Use of each material +
Communication Aspect
Accuracy of terms +
Grammatical accuracy +
Ability to increase user motivation +
Total score 49
Average 4.1 (Good Category)

13